🔗 Share this article

Over the weekend, Battlefield Studios introduced a new playlist called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this mode resembles the regular Breakthrough format but features several key changes:

• Each team has only eight real players, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Activities done by real players grant full XP, while bot actions provide reduced XP.
• Only two locations can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Elements like Player tags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

So essentially, the playlist lives up to its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think there's nothing wrong, as it provides more options for gamers looking for different methods to enjoy the title. However, if video games have taught us anything, it is that not everyone will be happy. In other words, many Battlefield 6 fans are upset.

Player Responses: Anger to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Avoid making the errors of your competitors," reads a response to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking idea," comments another. Meanwhile, in community forums, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this game," while someone else lists everything they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, there are players sharing how much they're enjoying the new mode. "It's very fun to warm up, human participants prevent it from being a complete grind but it's quite laid-back," says one Reddit comment. "This subreddit fails to see that there are gamers who have lives and don't play this title all the time. Let them find a middle ground," states another. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a parent gamer with limited time, this is perfect for me," and another applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Valid Criticisms and Player Input

All that said, players have constructive reasons to criticize the new mode. Some users have pointed out that it will make wait times more extended for different playlists due to the large amount of playlists currently available. Similarly, certain regions already encounter mostly bots in the existing playlists. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it primarily centers on combat against bots.

Finally, a major grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to provide complete rewards, including AI matches, but that got canned when they attempted to eliminate XP farming from the mode. So this new playlist feels like the player base meeting them halfway, as per forum feedback. Another describes this addition as the devs "making a mistake significantly, I experienced so much fun in the first couple of days, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Adjustments Be Made?

Should Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something to date with the latest installment, it's that they're paying attention and acting on player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, as did the specific battle pass objectives. Chances are that, if their data shows this recent mode isn't performing to their standards, they won't be shy to make further modifications.